<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imaginary politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudsoup.com/weblog/2006/01/30/imaginary-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudsoup.com/weblog/2006/01/30/imaginary-politics/</link>
	<description>no soup, no clouds</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudsoup.com/weblog/2006/01/30/imaginary-politics/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">25729905#comment-12</guid>
		<description>
A Liberal 1983 by-election &lt;i&gt;
A Liberal 1983 by-election leaflet carried an article entitled "A Straight Choice".

"That's an unacceptable form of language," Mr Hughes said. 
&lt;/i&gt;

Admittedly it's a report in the Mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Liberal 1983 by-election <i><br />
A Liberal 1983 by-election leaflet carried an article entitled &#8220;A Straight Choice&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s an unacceptable form of language,&#8221; Mr Hughes said.<br />
</i></p>
<p>Admittedly it&#8217;s a report in the Mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Black</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudsoup.com/weblog/2006/01/30/imaginary-politics/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">25729905#comment-13</guid>
		<description>As I have not seen the exact As I have not seen the exact text of what Simon said then I cannot accept that, but the leaflet was not homophobic nor does it say or imply what it is being credited with by contemporary commentators who were not there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have not seen the exact As I have not seen the exact text of what Simon said then I cannot accept that, but the leaflet was not homophobic nor does it say or imply what it is being credited with by contemporary commentators who were not there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudsoup.com/weblog/2006/01/30/imaginary-politics/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">25729905#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Fantasy land, Peter. You Fantasy land, Peter. You don't accept the plain statements of either Tatchell &lt;em&gt;or&lt;/em&gt; Simon Hughes. Without geting into smearing Tatchell - again - can't we both agree that Hughes &lt;i&gt;himself&lt;/i&gt; accepts that the wording of the election leaflet was at least unfortunate and has apologised for that, an apology that Tatchell has accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantasy land, Peter. You Fantasy land, Peter. You don&#8217;t accept the plain statements of either Tatchell <em>or</em> Simon Hughes. Without geting into smearing Tatchell - again - can&#8217;t we both agree that Hughes <i>himself</i> accepts that the wording of the election leaflet was at least unfortunate and has apologised for that, an apology that Tatchell has accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Black</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudsoup.com/weblog/2006/01/30/imaginary-politics/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">25729905#comment-16</guid>
		<description>As Tatchell has changed his As Tatchell has changed his story at least half a dozen times since 1983 I do not believe that his view adds anything to historical accuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Tatchell has changed his As Tatchell has changed his story at least half a dozen times since 1983 I do not believe that his view adds anything to historical accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
